The Boromirs Among Us

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/12/the-evil-among-us-liam-neeson-in-taken-2/

Connelly makes some observations about Zionist crime that is intrinsically tied to the supremacist and hate perpetuating ideology of Judaism, but his article is only a brushing on the dirty surface and not an exposing of the rotten core.

Connelly begins by pointing out that the United States should in no way consider Israel an allied nation and names the Lavon Affair as the reason. (We assume that most inquisitive readers see the Lavon Affair as but the start of an era of hidden Israeli aggression against the United States. Connelly then suggests that there is actually a far more constant and subtle war going on, one of "laying the mental threads." Citing several examples of documentary works that have investigated the portrayal of Arabs (and all Muslims, really) in film, as well as referring to the 1998 movie The Siege, Connelly makes his point that Hollywood is actually a Jewish fiefdom working to manipulate all Americans into hating Arabs and Muslims.

Is Connelly genuinely concerned about the racism directed at these people? If you thought so, read the following contradiction:

"The issue is not really whether these images have a substantial element of truth. Muslims are indeed the most likely people on the planet these days to be terrorists."

And so, Connelly has not only spotted propaganda, but has also added his fair share!

First off, Connelly is going by the ZC prescribed definition of terrorist, which essentially means "angry looking Muslim." If a "terrorist" is someone who threatens people with displays of large-scale violence in order to make them fear for their safety, this definition fits a whole lot better with the Israeli Defense Forces than with those whom they have starved, occupied and slandered since 1948. However, those oppressive criminals have a well oiled PR machine and media backing them up and shifting blame, thus Connelly should have said: "Muslims are indeed the most likely people on the planet to be shown as terrorists."

Now for the howler: TOO promotes Fitna by Geert Wilders (Jew)
Connelly seems to acknowledge this when he shows the 2008 film Taken (Jewish screenwriter) and the popular television show 24 (Jewish producer) to be nothing more than Jewish manipulations to get Westerners to hate Muslims. So, Connelly is back to pointing out Jewish crimes, including the sly inversion presented in Taken: the slave trade is actually more a Jewish crime than a Muslim one. (He uses a story from the Jerusalem Post to point out a key aspect of Jewish racist double-standard: in Israel, slavery is legal if it involves non-Jews. The main victims are young Slavic women who are conned into going to Israel with bogus job prospects.)

But Connelly then ends by saying that the film Taken:

"provides a useful function by again alerting Americans, French, and other Westerners to the risk posed by the presence of alien elements amongst us."

Again he is back to promoting the propaganda that the Jew never ceases to sell!

In the end, Connelly's article is an uncoordinated blast-off: he recognizes the enemy of the world, but not our potential allies. He also doesn't attack Jewish thinking: he presents empirical observations about how Jews manipulate the world, but doesn't attack Jewry on ideological grounds. He is, in effect, using Jewry's methods against Jewry, thus will never really change anything. Things are doomed to forever be done the immoral and nefarious Jewish way unless those methods are destroyed. Connelly is a fine example of the Boromir Syndrome - "Let's use the enemy's weapon against him!" That's like saying you don't agree with Jewish usury and then round up all your friends to out-compete the moneychangers. Even if you win, the Beast lives on in you.

Connelly also writes:

"While terrorism is one clear risk, it is not the only one, as Taken shows."

Even Boromir realized that Sauron must be destroyed, but he didn't see the correct way to do it. "Terrorism" is a problem, yes, but is Connelly willing to say that the bulk of it is a mirage created by Jewish media and Israeli false flags? He mentions skepticism for the official 9/11 story and the Lavon Affair, yet at the same time promotes the official hogwash stories and "explanations" - Connelly sees Taken as propaganda, but buys its message. From this, we should consider that he is being led by the Jew and doesn't even know it.

Aragorn (thinking): "Put the sword down, you useful idiot."

Source: http://swordofelysium.blogspot.com/2011/01/boromirs-among-us-occidental-observer.html